Home--->chamber of mines of south africa v amcu and

  • Chamber of Mines of South Africa v AMCU and Others (J 99

    30-01-2014· In respect of Masimong Mine, Harmony and AMCU reached agreement for the granting of limited organisational rights to AMCU, following the referral of a dispute to the CCMA. In respect of Kusasalethu Mine, union rivalry between NUM and AMCU led to a number of unprotected underground sit-ins and strikes in the latter part of 2012.

    South Africa: Constitutional Court SAFLII

    Neutral citation: Association of Mineworkers and Construction Union and Others v Chamber of Mines of South Africa and Others [2017] ZACC 3. Coram: Nkabinde ACJ, Cameron J, Froneman J, Jafta J, Madlanga J, Mbha AJ, Mhlantla J and Zondo J. Judgments: Cameron J

    Association of Mineworkers and Construction Union

    05-12-2017· [2] The applicant is the Association of Mineworkers and Construction Union (AMCU), the first respondent is Chamber of Mines of South Africa (the Chamber of Mines), the second respondent is the National Union of Mineworkers (NUM), the third respondent is UASA, and the fourth respondent is Solidarity (Solidarity).

    South Africa: Labour Appeal Court Southern African Legal

    [1] The judgment of the Labour Court is published as: Chamber of Mines of South Africa (acting in its own name and obo Harmony Gold Mining Company Ltd and others) v Association of Mineworkers and Construction Union and Others [2014] 9 BLLR 895 (LC).

    Association of Mineworkers and News South African

    22-02-2017· The legal question was whether a collective agreement concluded between the Chamber of Mines (Chamber), on behalf of certain gold mining companies and the majority trade unions in the gold mining sector overall could be extended to bind the members of the Association of Mineworkers and Construction Union (AMCU), even though AMCU had majority representation at certain individual mines.

    South Africa: Constitutional Court SAFLII

    Association of Mineworkers and Construction Union v Chamber of Mines of South Africa [2017] ZACC 3; 2017 (3) SA 242 (CC); 2017 (6) BCLR 700 (CC) (AMCU I).

    Polity Association of Mineworkers and South African

    22-02-2017· Association of Mineworkers and Construction Union and Others v Chamber of Mines of South Africa and Others (CCT87/16) [2017] ZACC 3 22nd February 2017 On 21 February 2017 the Constitutional Court handed down judgment in an application for leave to appeal against a judgment and order of the Labour Appeal Court (LAC).

    Employment law update Chamber of Mines obo

    01-09-2014· The Chamber argued that Amcu was prevented from embarking on strike action in pursuit of higher wages in terms of s 65 read with s 23(1)(d). Amcu argued that each mining site constituted a single workplace despite being owned by one employer, and as such, any strike action they embark on would not be hit by the provisions the Chamber sought to reply on.

    What the ruling against Amcu means for us all IOL

    On the eve of what is now commonly referred to as the annual strike season, the Labour Appeal Court, in the matter of Chamber of Mines of South Africa and Others versus Amcu and Others was once

    THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG

    30 June 2021 commenced on 11 July 2018 at the Minerals Council South Africa (the Council). [9] In the run up to the negotiations, AMCU tabled its demands in a letter dated 4 June 2018, which included a proposal about implementation as follows: “The implementation date for the above increase should be the 1st of July 2018. In

    Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr Minority trade unions are bound

    In the case of Chamber of Mines of South Africa acting in its own name and obo Harmony Gold Mining Company Ltd and another v Association of Mineworkers and Construction Union (AMCU) and others[2014] 3 BLLR 258 (LC), the court held that AMCU, as a minority trade union, was bound by the collective agreement concluded by the employer and three other trade unions who, acting jointly, had

    Association of Mine Workers and Construction Union

    30-05-2019· The AMCU members were retrenched following a retrenchment agreement that was concluded by Royal Bafokeng and two other unions at the mine, the National Union of Mines (NUM) and United Association of South Africa (UASA).

    South Africa: Johannesburg Labour Court, Johannesburg

    [6] Association of Mineworkers and Construction Union and others v Chamber of Mines of SA acting in its own name and on behalf of Harmony Gold Mining Co (Pty) Ltd and others (2016) 37 ILJ 1333 (LAC). [7] Doctors for Life International v Speaker of the National Assembly and others [2006] ZACC 11 ; 2006 (6) SA 416 (CC) at paras 37 and 38.

    THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG

    AMCU sought to rescind the jurisdictional ruling with no success. [11] In these proceedings, AMCU seeks to review and set aside both the settlement agreement and the jurisdictional ruling. AMCU’s submissions [12] AMCU argued that it is neither a party to the PLA nor a member of either the

    Case Law CCMA

    amcu v chamber of mines of south africa: 463 k: download: z sidumo: 861 k: download: south african revenue service (sars) 278 k: download: nqobile moffat nxumalo: 449 k: download: mbs transport cc: 152 k: download: glencore operations south- africa (pty) ltd: 155 k: download: back 1 of 1 next > quick links.

    Home Minerals Council South Africa

    The South African mining industry’s response to COVID-19 has been comprehensive, collaborative and effective. The COVID portal provides an update on the Minerals Council’s approach, including our daily dashboard, and the resources we make available to members and non-members alike.

    Association of Mineworkers and News South African

    21-02-2017· Section 23(1)(d) of the Labour Relations Act — collective agreement between the chamber of mines and unions — validity of extension of collective agreement to members of union not party to collective agreement — meaning of “workplace” in section 23(1)(d) Individual mining operations not separate workplaces — each mining

    SA Labour Courts Judgments 2017 Justice/Home

    Swissport South Africa (Pty) Ltd V Mphahlele, Eprhraim : JHB: 2017 AMCU v Chamber of Mines and Others : JHB: 2017 12 05: Harmony v Valashiya : JHB: 2017 11 30: The MEC Biz Africa v Amcu : JHB: 2017 02 23: SZ Ndzuta V Minister of Police : JHB: 2017 02

    judgment-by-the-constitutional-court-21-02-2017(1).pdf

    2 Neutral citation: Association of Mineworkers and Construction Union and Others v Chamber of Mines of South Africa and Others [2017] ZACC 3 Coram: Nkabinde ACJ, Cameron J, Froneman J, Jafta J, Madlanga J, Mbha AJ, Mhlantla J and Zondo J Judgments: Cameron J (unanimous) Heard on: 24 November 2016 Decided on: 21 February 2017 Summary: section 23(1)(d) of the Labour Relations

    Association of Mineworkers and Construction Union and

    View Association of Mineworkers and Construction Union and Others v Chamber of Mines of South Africa and from PBL 4001W at University of Cape Town.

    THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG

    AMCU sought to rescind the jurisdictional ruling with no success. [11] In these proceedings, AMCU seeks to review and set aside both the settlement agreement and the jurisdictional ruling. AMCU’s submissions [12] AMCU argued that it is neither a party to the PLA nor a member of either the

    Case Law CCMA

    13-05-2021· amcu v chamber of mines of south africa: 463 k: download: z sidumo: 861 k: download: south african revenue service (sars) 278 k: download: nqobile moffat nxumalo: 449 k: download: mbs transport cc: 152 k: download: glencore operations south- africa (pty) ltd: 155 k: download: back 1 of 1 next > quick links. fraud hotline 0860 666 438

    South Africa: Johannesburg Labour Court, Johannesburg

    [4] Negotiations between the recognised unions, the applicant and other companies in the business of gold mining in regards to wages and terms and conditions of employment for the period 1 July 2018 to 30 June 2021 commenced on 11 July 2018 at the Mines Council of South Africa (previously known as the Chamber of Mines).

    Procedural Fairness in Retrenchments Global Business

    29-01-2020· On Thursday 23 January 2020, the Constitutional Court delivered judgement in the case of Association of Mine Workers and Construction Union and Others v Royal Bafokeng Platinum Mine Limited and Others.In this matter, the constitutionality of Section 189(1) of the Labour Relations Act (LRA) which deals with retrenchments was debated.

    National Union of Metal Workers of South Africa (NUMSA

    [37] In Association of Mineworkers and Construction Union and Others v Chamber of Mines of South Africa, [19] the appellant also contended inter alia, that the principle of majoritianism contained in s 23(1)(d) read with s 65(1)(a) of the LRA to the effect that minorities (employees and their union) are bound by a collective agreement concluded between the majority union and the employer

    Home Minerals Council South Africa

    The South African mining industry’s response to COVID-19 has been comprehensive, collaborative and effective. The COVID portal provides an update on the Minerals Council’s approach, including our daily dashboard, and the resources we make available to members and non-members alike.

    Association of Mineworkers and News South African

    21-02-2017· Section 23(1)(d) of the Labour Relations Act — collective agreement between the chamber of mines and unions — validity of extension of collective agreement to members of union not party to collective agreement — meaning of “workplace” in section 23(1)(d) Individual mining operations not separate workplaces — each mining

    Association of Mine Workers and Construction Union

    30-05-2019· The AMCU members were retrenched following a retrenchment agreement that was concluded by Royal Bafokeng and two other unions at the mine, the National Union of Mines (NUM) and United Association of South Africa (UASA).

    Polity Association of Mineworkers and Construction

    21-02-2017· Association of Mineworkers and Construction Union and Others v Chamber of Mines of South Africa and Others 21st February 2017 Section 23(1)(d) of the Labour Relations Act — collective agreement between the chamber of mines and unions — validity of extension of collective agreement to members of union not party to collective agreement — meaning of “workplace” in section 23(1)(d)

    Association of Mineworkers and Construction Union and

    View Association of Mineworkers and Construction Union and Others v Chamber of Mines of South Africa and from PBL 4001W at University of Cape Town.

    National Union of Metal Workers of South Africa (NUMSA

    [37] In Association of Mineworkers and Construction Union and Others v Chamber of Mines of South Africa, [19] the appellant also contended inter alia, that the principle of majoritianism contained in s 23(1)(d) read with s 65(1)(a) of the LRA to the effect that minorities (employees and their union) are bound by a collective agreement concluded between the majority union and the employer

    Consultation during retrenchment Collective agreements

    In stating that the extension of a collective agreement constitutes an exercise of public power, the court relied on the AMCU v Chamber of Mines South Africa [2017] 7 BLLR 641 (CC) where the court stated that the extension of an agreement under s23 of the LRA has many implications for members of the public and relies on statute.

    Procedural Fairness in Retrenchments Global Business

    29-01-2020· On Thursday 23 January 2020, the Constitutional Court delivered judgement in the case of Association of Mine Workers and Construction Union and Others v Royal Bafokeng Platinum Mine Limited and Others.In this matter, the constitutionality of Section 189(1) of the Labour Relations Act (LRA) which deals with retrenchments was debated.

    Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr Consultation during retrenchment

    23-07-2018· In stating that the extension of a collective agreement constitutes an exercise of public power, the court relied on the AMCU v Chamber of Mines South Africa [2017] 7 BLLR 641 (CC) where the court stated that the extension of an agreement under s23 of the LRA has many implications for members of the public and relies on statute.

    South Africa: Johannesburg Labour Court, Johannesburg

    [4] Negotiations between the recognised unions, the applicant and other companies in the business of gold mining in regards to wages and terms and conditions of employment for the period 1 July 2018 to 30 June 2021 commenced on 11 July 2018 at the Mines Council of South Africa (previously known as the Chamber of Mines).

    Your Guide to Labour Law in South Africa Labour Guide

    In stating that the extension of a collective agreement constitutes an exercise of public power, the court relied on the AMCU v Chamber of Mines South Africa [2017] 7 BLLR 641 (CC) where the court stated that the extension of an agreement under s23 of the LRA has many implications for members of the public and relies on statute.

  •